eFiles

Computer Writing and Research Lab   Department of Rhetoric and Writing   Department of English   University of Texas at Austin

writing

Writers' Survey

Resource Author
Lisa Moore, Department of EnglishPedagogical Goals
Goals: The aim of this series of questions is to solicit information about each student as a writer. The instructor can use this information in putting together the peer editing groups.

Classroom Wiki for New Terms and Concepts

Resource Author
Jim BrownPedagogical Goals
Goals: In creating wiki entries for new and interesting terms/concepts, this assignment aims to: 1) build a community knowledge base; 2) encourage collaboration; 3) Get students to do research on unfamiliar terms/concepts that they encounter; 4) get students to go beyond peer review and consider how to edit someone else's writing.

Fan Fiction Assignment

Assignment Author
CWRL Assignment DatabasePedagogical Goals of the Assignment
Description: This is a web research and short writing assignment (3-4 pages) designed for an E314J Lit and Film class or literary contests and contexts. While reading Pride and Prejudice, we examine fan web sites devoted to Jane Austen and her work. I then ask the students to peruse these sites and works of fan fiction that utilize characters from Pride and Prejudice, and to consider how those sites influence their perceptions and interpretations of Austen and Pride and Prejudice. Students research examples of fan sites and fan fiction, formulate a thesis, and then prove that thesis by using evidence from Pride and Prejudice and the selected web site.

Visual Rhetorical Analysis

Assignment Author
Stephanie Odom-RobertsonPedagogical Goals of the Assignment
For students to apply the rhetorical analysis skills they have been applying to verbal texts to visual ones.

Writing a Short, Analytic Paper: A Checklist

Assignment Author
Phil BarrishPedagogical Goals of the Assignment
Useful tips for writing an analytic paper.

Long-term Effects of Exposure to Imagery - Proposal Argument

Attribution
Visual Rhetoric WorkgroupPedagogical Goals of the Assignment
The goals of this assignment are 1) to introduce them to the difficult issue of causality and images, 2) to get them to think in abstract terms first, i.e., to argue an issue in general terms, before they apply those terms to more specific situations and test their validity, and 3) to help them decide for themselves how much evidence is “enough” for a given type of paper and what level of abstraction they need to employ in a given argumentative situation.

Comparison and Rhetorical Analysis

Attribution
Visual Rhetoric WorkgroupPedagogical Goals of the Assignment
This assignment has several goals: a) to give the students the opportunity to realize that successful arguments about rhetorical effect can be quite complex and require much research, b) to give them a chance to revise and incorporate some of their own writing into longer pieces of text with different goals, c) to help them realize that no description or comparison is “neutral;” all descriptions/comparisons have a particular rhetorical goal and audience, and their language and selection of elements is important.

A Cautionary Tale

Pedagogical Goals of the Assignment
The goal is to highlight the unreliability of the MS Word thesaurus, hopefully encouraging the students to use it more cautiously.

Organic Approach to Writing (Brian Bremen, Department of English)

Marking Up Papers

Remember: you’re not “correcting” papers– showing the writing every error that he or she made. Papers that bleed red ink only please cruel teachers and humiliate students. You’re trying to help students become better readers, writers, and thinkers. You need to be able to justify everything you do in those terms.

Don’t zoom in on the details right away. Step back and look at the writer’s whole argument in his or her own terms.

In descending order of importance, consider these questions:

1. Can you easily determine what is the argument here and why is it important?
2. Does the essay maintain a consistent focus on that argument or does it stray off its stated or implied purpose?
3. Is the development of the argument clear, purposeful, and substantial?

Clear: you can see a progression from one point to the next